Bajo Juárez – The City that Devours its Daughters with Alejandra Sanchez and Beverley Jacobs–Photos

Bajo Juárez – The City that Devours its Daughters with Alejandra Sanchez and Beverley Jacobs – Photos

 

Bajo Juarez_1

Mandy Nahanee

On September 8, 2011, Battered Women’s Support Services and Vancouver Latin American Film Festival co-hosted a special screening of Bajo Juárez – The City that Devours its Daughters, featuring Alejandra Sanchez the filmmaker and Beverley Jacobs former president Native Women’s Association of Canada. 

Over 120 people attended the screening held at W2 Media Cafe in Vancouver, BC.  We were joined by Mandy Nahanee and Rosa Elena Arteaga.  Here’s our blog with all the details of the event  Bajo Juarez – City that Devours its Daughters

 

Bajo Juarez_2

Mandy Nahanee

 

Bajo Juarez_5

(foreground)  Jesus Gonzalez and Esteban Gonzalez

 

Bajo Juarez_6

 

Bajo Juarez_8

Beverley Jacobs

 

Bajo Juarez_9

Beverley Jacobs

 

Bajo Juarez_10

Rosa Elena Arteaga and Alejandra Sanchez

 

Bajo Juarez_12

Rosa Elena Arteaga and Alejandra Sanchez

 

Bajo Juarez_13

Alejandra Sanchez

 

Bajo Juarez_3

Beverley Jacobs

 

Bajo Juarez_14

(front left) Sara Yassan

 

Bajo Juarez_15

(back left)  Annie Zhang

 

Bajo Juarez_16

Alejandra Sanchez

Bajo Juarez_4

Beverley Jacobs

 

Bajo Juarez_18

Alejandra Sanchez

Thank you Alejandro Gonzalez for these wonderful photographs!!

© photos by alex gonzalez, oaxaca studio, 2011

Anatomy of Manipulation–The Jailhouse Tapes

Anatomy of Manipulation – The Jailhouse Tapes

When Women Became Victims

by Angela Marie MacDougall

Over the objection of prisoners’ groups and defense lawyers and already routine in some New York State and federal prisons, New York City changed policy in 2007 to permit the recording of prisoners telephone calls at the city jail. “Fly on the wall” accounts of emotional manipulation and threats by men cooling their heels for violence against women were documented in jail house recordings and reported in The New York Times February 2011.  Chilling in detail for the first time, the larger public got a glimpse of what women and their children deal with when surviving male violence in an intimate relationship.

Going one step further Meet Me on the Hill Where We Used to Park:  Interpersonal Process Associated with Victim Recantations  is a U.S. study which for the first time recorded jailhouse telephone conversations between men charged with, (what they call) felony domestic violence and their woman victims to reveal why sometimes women decide not to follow through on charges.

Researchers listened to telephone conversations between 17 accused men abusers in a Washington state detention facility and their women victims, all of whom decided to withdraw their accusations of abuse.   According to the study, the couples were aware they were being recorded through an automated message at the beginning of each call.  The analysis of the conversations confirmed what we have been seeing in our work at Battered Women’s Support Services that the men abusers are not necessarily threatening more violence rather are using a more nuanced and sophisticated appeals designed to:

  • minimize their actions,
  • deny the experience of the woman,
  • create doubt of her account and recollection of her experience,
  • blame her for his actions,
  • ultimately gain the sympathy of the woman thus
  • turning the focus away from any harm done to her to the sense of harm he feels is being done to him by being in jail/involved in the criminal legal system.

Adapted from the abstract, after analyzing the calls, the researchers identified a five-step process that went from the women victims vigorously defending themselves in the phone calls to agreeing to a plan to recant their testimony against the accused abuser:

Stage 1

Typically, in the first and second conversations there is a heated argument between the couple, revolving around the event leading to the abuse charge. In these early conversations, the woman is strong, and resists the accused perpetrator’s account of what happens.  The phone calls show how the woman starts out with a sense of determination and is eager to advocate for herself, but gradually that erodes as the phone calls continue.

Stage 2

The male abusers utilizes classic emotional power and control tactics minimizing the abuse, denies that it happened at all and if it did it wasn’t that serious and if it happened it was her fault.  In one couple, where the woman suffered strangulation and a severe bite to the face, the accused male perpetrator repeatedly reminded the woman that he was being charged with “felony assault,” while asking whether she thought he deserved the felony charge, eventually wearing her down where she agreed that he didn’t deserve a felony charge.

Within the second stage the male perpetrator appeals to her sympathy describes how he is suffering, depressed, and misses her and the children.  This is often effective where she begins to provide empathic responses attempting to comfort and soothe him.

In one case, the accused perpetrator threatened suicide and said in a phone call to the woman victim, “Nobody loves me though, right?”  At that point, the woman’s tone changed dramatically, and she sounded concerned that he might actually try to hurt himself and from then on, the woman promised to help him get out of jail.

Stage 3

In the third stage, after the accused abuser has gained the sympathy of the woman, the couple bonds over their love for each other and positions themselves against others who “don’t understand them.”

Stage 4

The fourth stage involves the perpetrator asking the woman to recant her accusations against him and the woman complying.

Stage 5

Finally, in the fifth stage, the couple constructs the recantation plan and develops their stories.

My daughter Leona, who represents the larger public, not necessarily privy to first-hand survivor accounts, read the abstract and had this perspective, “We all know they (abusive men) are manipulative, it is good that this research shows in great detail exactly how they do it.”

It appears that the study was not written for larger public, like Leona, and seems to have been written for criminal legal system personnel and victim advocates.  Though identified as a target audience for the recommendations, feminist and feminist ending violence activists consulted for this blog were underwhelmed by the study and irritated by it’s premise that women and women’s advocates don’t already know this.  The overwhelming sentiment from advocates consulted for this blog, identified the challenge of working with the system where over forty years of survivor based expert information is seemingly disregar
ded until an academic study “reveals” it.

“The fact that perpetrators use emotional manipulation, minimization, mothers’ guilt feelings re: children or the abuser’s welfare…this is exactly what we share with them(women). The article is disturbing, not because of some revelatory study, but because it suggests some women’s advocates and some academics ‘still don’t get’ the dynamics of woman abuse despite 40 years of experts – survivors themselves and feminist frontline workers – explaining it to them. This also implies that we ‘haven’t’ been telling (women) this, which is shocking and astounding to me.”  said “S” from Ontario

Alison Brewin, gender consultant and former executive director, West Coast Legal Education and Action Fund shared these thoughts, “…but does this research surprise you at all? Anyone who understands women’s lives understands the complexities of loyalty, love and the profound pressure to keep a family together…our society is designed to support women keeping their men and fathers of their children in the nuclear family unit and it usually results in women doing a whole lot of ‘compromising’ including keeping an abusive and violent spouse in the home for the social and economic ‘benefits’ that entails.”

Curiously, the study characterizes the actions of the perpetrators as “witness tampering”, and the U.S. has witness tampering laws.   Canada doesn’t have “witness tampering” laws per se, however Section 139 of the Criminal Code is close.  Contemplating these manipulative actions of perpetrators as obstructing the legal proceedings could benefit from more legal analysis.  As a legal strategy for crown prosecutors, this may have benefit and a measure of balance for women who are forced to navigate a violent abusive partner and a criminal legal system that needs it’s witnesses.  I have never heard of a case where a perpetrator was further charged under this section for manipulating women victims to recant.  I have, however, seen and heard numerous instances where women victims are punished by the criminal legal system for failing to participate in the criminal legal proceedings as witnesses to their own assault.  At Battered Women’s Support Services, we have often heard criminal legal system personnel refer to women victims as “reluctant” witnesses and how problematic that is for them and for the criminal legal system.  Marjaneh Aghamohseni, Battered Women’s Support Services Victim Service Worker said, “Some abused women recant out of fears/terror/distress since they are afraid of further violence by him. Based on women’s experiences with the police, they know that the accused will be released on conditions after arrest. If there is a protection order in place, it gets complicated if he pretends that he wants to see his child. Police tend to be on his side. But we know that this is another tactic from the abuser to continue his abusive behaviours.”

When it comes to violence against women in intimate relationships, through our work at Battered Women’s Support Services we have identified at least three areas that the criminal legal system can’t navigate…well:

  1. Women who self-defend (here’s what we have written on women arrestsresources we have written for women and advocates and stay tuned, there is more to come)
  2. Women who “recant”
  3. Survivor-based and/or feminist anti violence activist knowledge and experience

“E” from Vancouver had these thoughts, “Really when you think about it, the recant issue is something that has been going on for a very long time.  Though women who have been charged with assault (in the numbers we are seeing these days) is comparatively new, in both of these situations the feminist anti violence activists knowledge isn’t acknowledged, foremost, in these discussions even though we would have seen these things long before the system.”

“S” from Ontario further added, “If this study provides ‘proof’ of what survivors, feminists, advocates and countless authors have been saying all along about male violence against women, well I can only ask why four decades of women’s voices wasn’t proof enough?”

Annie Zhang, Battered Women’s Support Services Legal Advocate shared this regarding the women who self-defend and the women who recant,  “The issues in both categories, in my opinion, demonstrate the shortcomings of the criminal justice system not only in providing protection toward battered women, but in achieving its own ends of convicting the guilty while protecting the innocent.”

When Women Became Victims Series:

Risk Assessment – E-Learnings

Social Justice VS Criminal Justice

 

“Retro” Sexism: The Desperation of Sleeman–Old Milwaukee “Free Girl” Ad Campaign

“Retro” Sexism:  The Desperation of Sleeman – Old Milwaukee “Free Girl”Ad Campaign

by Angela Marie MacDougall

FreeGirl

 

When doing the work to end violence against women there is no shortage of opportunities where we have to decide what battles to fight and how to fight them.  In order to seek change for individual women, for our relationships and gender relations, for our communities, the policies, the laws and for the larger society at BWSS we find ourselves working on all these fronts.  Presently with,  six – ten women a day seeking crisis support for their first time at Battered Women’s Support Services, increases of women arrests for allegedly perpetrating domestic violence, deportations of women who are in Canada fleeing gender persecution, the denial of women’s voices at the BC Missing Women’s Commission of Inquiry, reports of another woman sexually assaulted at First United Church Shelter, the, seemingly, stalled BC Highway of Tears investigation, “Free Girl With Every Can” the latest ad campaign for Old Milwaukee beer provided another opportunity to decide if it would be wise to syphon energy to respond to something so obviously offensive. At first glance I wondered if this was a cynical trap laid to get the “feminists” and the “frat-boys” riled up and trading barbs to the tune of increased revenue for the brewer.

The photo above of the latest ad displayed on a billboard located at the corner of Hastings and Glen in Vancouver, BC was snapped with the ever present camera phone during a sunrise coffee run.  The billboard is positioned a block or so from the stroll where men from homes with manicured lawns and with car seats in the back of their vehicles troll the streets and alleys looking for a blow job or a fuck that they may (or may not) pay a girl or a woman for.  Just like the location for the billboard ad is not an accident, neither is the treatment of women as objects that come free will beer.

Objectification of girls and women is at the heart of intimate partner violence.  Not only are images of our bodies and body parts used to sell everything in marketing, not only with the advent of pixel manipulation literally morphing images of women into objects, for the women who we see at BWSS the very actions of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by men requires that he turn her into an object in order to do the abuse and violence.  Here’s our blog on Beauty and Body Image in the Media.  What we know through our work with women and through our own lives is when male partners use violence it isn’t, Tina, Maria, Diana, Jasmine that is being beat it is that “fucking bitch”, that “fat cow” that “stupid cunt”.  Rendering women into an object is at the beginning, middle and end of abusive/violent incidents and abusive/violent relationships.  In fact, when I worked as a counsellor with men facilitating batterer treatment groups, one of the group exercises we had men participants accomplish was to ensure that every time they referred to their female partner that they used her name.  Time after time it was a challenge as group participants struggled to use women’s given names instead defaulting to terms like:  “my old lady”, “that one I live with”, “my woman”, “the wife”, “the girlfriend” and worse.

Misogyny and sexism in beer advertising is a well worn path and Old Milwaukee (in Canada brewed by Sleeman Breweries which is owned by Sapporo Breweries based in Japan) has positioned themselves as a leading sexist advertiser including their 1991 Swedish Bikini Team campaign.  Highly popular with their target market the brewer was  forced to drop the ads after protests from the National Organization of Women.  With their jobs at stake, Strohs (the then US owner) faced a lawsuit from their own employees who claimed the campaign contributed to sexual harassment and discrimination.

Matter of fact, sexism in advertising has morphed recently and “Retro Sexism and “Uber Ironic” advertising is becoming industry standard with a few companies leading the way.  Retro sexism can be defined as modern attitudes and behaviours that mimic or glorify sexist aspects of the past in an ironic way.

beerpinup

“Honestly, not sure I like the girls on the cans in the first place. Never mind the ads on the bill boards.” said Bernadette Keenan in a Facebook comment.  And she makes an excellent point, Old Milwaukee went with old school pin up images of women on their cans in 2010, harkening backward.  Anita from Feminist Frequency breaks down Retro Sexism and Uber Ironic advertising that continues to grow as an advertising industry standard:

 

After posting the camera phone pictures  to my Facebook page and on Twitter, I received several messages that resembled this one, “ …this campaign is so obviously misogynist, sexist and stupid, how did it get through all the checks?”

Checks?  There are no checks!  Alison Brewin, gender consultant and former executive director, West Coast Legal Education and Action Fund said on Friday, “There is no government or state regulation of ads – other than perhaps criminal hate laws. And sadly, the death of national women’s organizations like Mediawatch and NAC means there are no national watch dogs in Canada to address such outrageously sexist advertising. Some of us may feel this ought to be covered by laws against spreading hate, but unfortunately in Canada, society as a whole seems doesn’t view hatred of women something to regulate, much less the state.”

Women Taking Action

The question of whether to respond to sexist advertising, in general, and specifically Old Milwaukee “Free Girl” campaign, has generated discussion.  Including these sentiments posted on Facebook by Candice “I think this has gone a little too far!! it’s an old style pinup drawing on a can of beer!! Who cares!! Girls we are getting a little too sensitive! let’s worry about what really matters in this world, not some drawings on a can….”

Most women consulted for this blog shared the thoughts of Mj,  “I care. I have daughters and granddaughters. Every image that normalizes the objectification of women’s bodies makes it harder for us to see ourselves through valuing eyes, and not the sexist lens that distorts and demeans us all. It’s tougher to have a workplace free of harassment, and safe public spaces. It makes it that much harder for couples to have healthy relationships. I care.”

Several women cared enough to make Old Milwaukee, Sleeman and Sapporo subject of two Facebook groups and an online petition all calling for a boycott of their products.

As posted by one of the groups:

Please take a second to click LIKE to tell the beer company that women and GIRLS .. children… are not commodities to be bought and traded.  How to take action?
• Don’t buy their beer and ask all your friends to consider doing the same (and tell them why).
• Demand that the company take these ads down now and issue an apology. E-mail: oldmil@oldmilwaukee.com (they will forward your e-mail on to Sleeman Breweries)
You can also contact Sleeman Breweries directly (the makers of Old Milwaukee in Canada):
http://www.sleeman.ca/en/contact
• File a complaint with Advertising Standards Canada by filling in this online form: http://www.adstandards.com/en/Standards/consumerSubmission.asp
• Sign this petition started by Leslie Knope of the Kingston Sexual Assault Centre: http://www.change.org/petitions/boycott-old-milwaukee-and-their-recent-ad-campaign
• Write a letter to the editor (local paper & national papers) i.e: The Globe and Mail (letters@globeandmail.ca). Here’s a link to the page that describes The Globe and Mail’s guidelines for letters to the editor: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/letters-to-the-editor/

Women drink beer, in 2008, Jezebel posted:  Women like beer, if only beer liked women… “Despite sexist ads, frat-boy associations and the fact that it is not pink, plenty of women drink beer.” The post encourages women to exercise their economic power through their purchases.  Jezebel was joined by About Face who were especially concerned about beer advertising and wrote the following on how women could take action:

And as a female beer-drinker, I’m sick of the boys-will-be-boys crap of beer advertisements.

As a whopping 25 percent of their customer base, women have the economic power to create change. There are many ways to take action:

1. Support brands that don’t use sexist advertising.

2. Read and support initiatives such as Women Enjoying Beer, an organization that encourages breweries to better market to women and has a blog with posts on women-friendly breweries.

3. And last but not least, when you see beer ads that offend you, file an advertising complaint with the Beer Institute.

4. In Canada, you can contact the Brewers Association of Canada.

5. You can also write to breweries directly.

Avoiding the Rewarding Bad Behaviour Trap

Daniela Escolar, BWSS Stopping the Violence Counsellor, wondered if our pubic response would feed the controversy and therefore increase Old Milwaukee beer sales.  That concern was contemplated after the efforts of feminists in Hamilton, Peterborough and Kingston Ontario were successful in having the ads pulled.  Though the brewer agreed to pull the ads they said there would be a week to ten day lag.  By delaying the ad removal Hamilton Take Back the Night thought the brewer was trying to generate controversy to get free advertising. Kingston, ON local news dubbed the campaign distasteful and sexist, and Ken Wong, professor with Queen’s University said, “if I’m the company the ad has now done everything that I want my ad to do, it’s got my name out in front of people, it’s built a strong bond between me and my frat boy customers and for the people that were alienated, frankly, from a business perspective, are not my focal concern”

milwaukee

 

How Beer Advertisers Tell Men to Man Up  –  Heteronormativity

Robert Brenneman is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Saint Michael’s College, author of Homies and Hermanos: God and the Gangs in Central America (Oxford University Press) noted that for him it had become difficult to ignore what appears to be an increase in the frequency of commercials (including beer advertising) ridiculing men who trespass the dominant masculine norms or “heteronormativity.” .  “But why pay attention to commercials? After all, aren’t advertisers and the company stockholders they represent simply interested in making money? They get our attention by making us laugh, so why take them seriously? True enough, the company executives who hire ad makers and pay millions of dollars air them during highly-rated sporting events have profits as a primary motive; but whether or not they are misogynists or homophobes (or support progressive causes) is beside the point. The sociological perspective compels us to look beyond individual motives per se to examine the social impact of institutions like the media. When we do, we find patterns of inequality both revealed and sustained through media—yes, even through beer commercials.”

Will Mattessich considers how pervasive the defining of “masculinity” is in beer commercials.  Mattessich considers the typical sexist ad layout for a “male” product: The anti-intellectualist-male-outsmarts-emotional/intelligent woman. “The ad wants you to believe that you can be lazy, unattractive, and devoid of wit, but beer will give you a shot with smart, Carmen Electra look-alikes who don’t even like you.”  Among other things the ad is telling the male consumer,   “Are you sick of hearing women talk? Are you stupid and lazy? Do you need constant reassurance that you are a man?  Have a beer!

“A lot of the commercials tend to make it seem like it’s OK for men to be immature, which is a certain theme in masculinity right now — a theme of extended adolescence,” said William Liu, a UI professor of psychological and quantitative foundations.  “Advertisers are always trying to tap into insecurities.  In this type of advertising, the insecurities are about being male. And despite our best efforts these commercials serve as a reference point for us and affect our views of masculinity and ourselves.”  And may I add, presumably, women?

The Desperation of Bad Taste

Though it is difficult to discern from my vantage point, Tremblay and Tremblay wrote in The Games Brewers Play that there is correlation between hard times and over the top sexist marketing:

More recently, brewers under financial stress have resorted to the so-called “beer-n-babes” advertising campaigns. Thirty-seven in fact, one could argue that the use of sexually provocative ads is an indicator that a brewer is under financial stress.

It is worthy of noting that in the middle of the economic downturn, Pabst, the current US owner of Old Milwaukee, revived the Swedish Bikini Team to market Old Milwaukee in 2005.

So there is the economic downturn…AND by all accounts Old Milwaukee is a bad product, a beer that just tastes bad.  As reported in The Beer Advocate beer taster Chris Cage from Medicine Hat, Alberta gave Old Milwaukee a D+.  Well this isn’t anything special to look at….very typical at best…it has a very light grainy yellowish tone to it. It smells dry, musty and grainy…just bland.  As for taste… bland, grainy. It reminds me of overcooked rice and dust. Thin and watery best describe this beer, its’ nothing that I’d pay my money for again.”

In light of how bad the beer tastes when considering the ad campaign, Athena Affan, BWSS Stopping the Violence Counsellor, said, “Take a crappy product and slap an image of a woman on it, an iconic image that tells the consumer (men) ‘buy me.’”

And it seems that men are falling for it as beer taster “Swant” from Calgary, Alberta who also gave Old Milwaukee D+ confirmed Athena’s point:

“This beer is typical in colour to many cheap lagers. Grainy yellow with small, slow forming head. The smell is cheap, musty and flat. The taste is average, nothing to write home about…mostly below average.  Based on pure drinkability, I would rank this higher than deplorable, but only because there is a picture of a pin-up girl on the side of the can which changes every several months and really takes your mind off the beer.”