What Happened After B.C. Declared Gender-Based Violence an Epidemic?
A look at the missed opportunities, the rising risks, and the five urgent actions B.C. needs today.
In January 2025, the Government of British Columbia declared gender-based violence (GBV) a national epidemic. That moment carried weight. It signaled overdue recognition of what survivors, Indigenous women and girls, gender-diverse people, frontline advocates, and community-based organizations have been saying for decades: that gender-based violence is not a private tragedy, it is a social and safety emergency.
It acknowledged something essential. The violence that devastates families, fractures communities, and takes lives is not inevitable. It is the result of structural failures of housing systems, court systems, child protection systems, police practices, social policies that fail to act, fail to intervene, or fail to protect.
But recognition, on its own, changes little.
Since that declaration, British Columbia has lost at least 37 women to violence many killed by men they knew. In some regions, police calls related to intimate partner violence have surged by over 25%. Transition houses remain at or over capacity. Courts continue to delay, defer, and deny justice. Victim services and anti-violence organizations are stretched beyond their limits. Survivors are still navigating 60 well-documented barriers to safety, barriers shaped by poverty, racism, housing precarity, colonialism, and inconsistent institutional responses.
Across Canada, over 100 municipalities, counties, and regional governments have declared GBV or IPV an epidemic since 2020. These declarations have helped raise awareness, but they have not, in most cases, delivered real change. They have not been followed by legislation or created accountability mechanisms, they have not secured stable core funding for frontline services and they have not mandated universal risk assessment. They have not prevented the next killing.
British Columbia cannot become the latest jurisdiction where symbolic recognition stands without structural response.
A Map for Action Already Exists
There is no shortage of evidence or expertise. In 2024, BC Attorney General Niki Sharma commissioned an independent systemic review of how the province’s legal system responds to GBV, led by lawyer and human rights expert Dr. Kim Stanton. The findings were damning: one in three police-reported cases never makes it to Crown counsel; charges are withdrawn or stayed at rates that leave survivors retraumatized and unprotected; risk assessment is uneven, child protection, law enforcement, and family court practices vary dramatically from one region to another, and responses are often siloed, underfunded, and unaccountable.
The core problem is not lack of will on the frontlines. It is a lack of coordinated, survivor-centred investment in social and safety infrastructure, a system designed to hold the line when others fail.
These findings echo those of the Mass Casualty Commission, which investigated the 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia. That tragedy, which took place during COVID lockdowns while “epidemic” language dominated public discourse, was rooted in gender-based and intimate partner violence. The Commission’s final report called GBV an “epidemic” in Canada and issued 130 recommendations, including:
- The creation of a national GBV commissioner
- Stronger police accountability
- Reformed public alerting systems
- Cross-sector coordination of services, with clear government responsibility
Both Stanton’s BC report and the national Mass Casualty Commission point to the same truth: epidemic language alone will not shift systems. Only coordinated, legislated, and resourced action will.
Now Is the Time for Structural Response
As we approach the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women and the 16 Days of Activism, British Columbia faces a choice. Will it remain a province of declarations or become a province of delivery?
The context is urgent because narly half of Canadians now say that inflation and housing costs are making day-to-day life unaffordable. Arguably, confidence in institutions is falling as rising hate, deepening economic precarity, and growing mental health crises are compounding risk factors for gender-based violence. The need for structural prevention and rapid intervention has never been greater.
Over five decades, frontline organizations and survivors have shown what works-intentional, coordinated, well-funded, and accountable systems of response. With that knowledge in hand, five immediate actions can be taken now to prevent the next femicide in British Columbia.
Five Immediate Actions to Prevent the Next Femicide in BC
- Mandate Municipal GBV Task Forces
Require every city in British Columbia to establish a gender-based violence task force that coordinates housing, policing, justice, and survivor services rooted in lived expertise and backed by authority. - Stabilize Frontline Services
Deliver a 15% emergency funding increase to community-based programs, STV outreach, transition houses, Indigenous-led services, and victim supports, before capacity collapses. - Standardize Risk Assessment
Make risk assessment tools mandatory across all key systems: police, Crown counsel, family court, child protection, housing, and health. Enforce their use with training, data integration, and oversight. - Launch a Province-Wide Prevention Campaign
Use the communications power of government to shift public understanding, reach men, de-normalize coercive control, and challenge the misogyny, racism, and colonial legacies that drive violence. - Appoint a Provincial GBV Lead
Create a dedicated leadership position within Public Safety or the Attorney General’s office to coordinate inter-ministerial action, track implementation, and hold the system accountable.
These are not aspirational goals, they are urgent, evidence-based actions aligned with national and provincial recommendations, decades of frontline experience, and what survivors themselves say they need.
One year after BC’s declaration, what’s required now is action. These five steps could save lives if implemented now. The time for symbolic language has passed and the time for structural response is here.







